CaliforniaSchoolsJurupa Valley High

Jurupa Valley High

PublicRegular
Jurupa Valley, California · Jurupa Unified
Teachers71.0FTE
Ratio23.1:1students per teacher
Students1,638enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students1,638
Grade Span9–12
Student:Teacher23.1:1
Free/Reduced Lunch84%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
23.8:1
3.0%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
71
0.0%vs prior yr
Enrollment
1,693
3.4%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:247
10.7%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:10,159
8.0%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:1,727
34.7%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
SSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.7:116.8:119.0:121.1:123.3:125.4:12020202120222023202424.7:124.6:122.9:123.1:123.8:1Jurupa Valley HighUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

1,6291,6541,6791,7041,7291,754707172737475202020212022202320241,7271,7451,7161,6381,6937071757171EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment1,7271,7451,7161,6381,693
Teacher FTE7071757171
Pupil : Teacher ratio24.7:124.6:122.9:123.1:123.8:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:12,1901:24,3791:36,5691:48,7581:60,9482015201720201:3391:2761:2471:10,5811:56,433Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:2,2861:4,5711:6,8571:9,1421:11,4282015201720201:10,5811:9,4061:10,1591:1,6931:2,6451:1,727Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)56.17
Nurses (FTE)0.20.20.2
Psychologists (FTE)10.61
Social Workers (FTE)0.200
Counselor : Pupils1:3391:2761:2471:250
Nurse : Pupils1:10,5811:9,4061:10,1591:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:1,6931:2,6451:1,7271:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:10,5811:56,4331:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.